IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-02.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 04 July 2015 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DA01A1BB0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 08:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PaUn_5oXSR0J for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 08:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48AA01A1B6E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 08:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qget71 with SMTP id t71so55980513qge.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q+f9m6vWzrPfeQYNXKMANFgzoiVOkQCXzKZwuFrbPAI=; b=uOHr8YBnFi7Up0w2RPjhuyMUJJJFsYQS1+0BYau8kt5AnYD5gEP1iuys4k+k0ECoFF 1+Y38lM9jEqtTfDGcvWPBMJAiYiWOiIeqBcQaEYZ9pk+oqStTpIjRmRW/BhLJbR4jS/p M2aHTxBMUAmjV083Sv/UON6S1oCFNKvSssIdQPh9i8askMoQhGHrMhPOKDa87Cftfyeg t4WVfAfNH+eGKWEaj+dXh5kqJzUowIcmgdABNOY/uGoLLR6YNnhlvnd4RmzaJbkvSmEY PQVyYualgw4jOfMRaOgXudAR2yGdVGUbZBR5yDi+YxHk4+CTHARwS9Ebh5kOTN9gdltA vYxQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.25.40 with SMTP id k40mr80580033qkh.30.1436022393521; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from still.local (184-19-93-177.drr03.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.19.93.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e104sm6283162qgd.29.2015.07.04.08.06.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20150703140645.10082.67901.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55969B86.1070805@bellis.me.uk>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5597F677.1000909@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:06:31 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55969B86.1070805@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/R7QUoBx4kSQt0VgWxxuWxwOduEo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:06:35 -0000

All

I'm hoping to see some discussion on the mailing list on this, or we'll 
bring it up in Prague.

This draft has been languishing that was resolved with some discussion, 
and it's time to either move it along or shut it down.

tim

On 7/3/15 10:26 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>
> This update to the draft adds the support of two additional authors,
> simplifies it somewhat and also including a connection-close signal.
>
> A further change is the removal of the usage of the option over UDP
> since the semantics of whether a UDP message can say anything about a
> subsequent TCP message are unclear.
>
> The authors request working group discussion on this point.
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email