[DNSOP] Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-00.txt

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > So, vendor extension namespaces make sense when they need a
    > 'playground' to operate within for instance-to-instance
    > interoperability. How would that work here -- what's the case for a
    > "vendor-specific" database that *isn't* referred to by others?

I thought that this was dealing with the part:

mcr> 2) we want to allow the set of errors to be easily extended by many different
mcr>    resolvers

and databases
(as you clarified)

mcr>    who have an increasing and many obtuse set of filtering
mcr>    conditions.

So when we get a new filtering that says that domains with adjacent vowels
forbidden, rule 4Q8NQ from a coalition of western (Albertan, Saskatchewan)
separatists attacking the other 7 provinces (the other 7 have adajacent
vowels, but ya gotta think bilingually.  I should be asleep).

When non-Canadian users wonder, they get a nice explanation in their
language.

Unless my work is wrong, I think it's a really good^Wbad, absolutely insane example.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     [e-mail]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [