[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE3C1A70FD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RjKbw_Y7wY81 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3703D1A70FF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so1084058qgd.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HMOwh4ELJr74jullIVXbb5LcciDHRWTRKhvKJbGTaBM=; b=GQ+v5mN5+YgyCuuWZDW3Ed8mse9xCXuM8xabVA/i09hWisl+ie5y+IbYklplcZuNSY 9k7OlOSKZrBp2GtIt5GtZBk3S4+kziu6+/HmsbElGqU32YR+refUg9wUk33gdhhqeubr 3KUBhUOu+Fbn9hJpGD+44gdiXBM3dHsf7LOFA2Yw2po5TEirxt0WQeY9SSOJ6cHDUGCR 4oxSUpOlCN0TFLa+q2wjZZEcwxqUMc5XnfK39qi+rsE8ZTg/Tlh0Z3DGPco00PQ86DJw EwUfjDZ71hiumxLDJThhqszJXRo+H7Ja6JuadtazuVB515YdO+qyC4p7NwsbPyBAhz5I DXtA==
X-Received: by 10.224.46.67 with SMTP id i3mr14117404qaf.90.1410542412832; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from still.local ([50.127.153.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h91sm3385846qge.38.2014.09.12.10.20.12 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54132B4B.7040309@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:20:11 -0400
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SMfu-HrcRFMW-reOeCi6IK0g1bU
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:20:25 -0000
All, In Toronto their was an update on the draft dnssec roadblock avoidance, discussion emerged about the various aspects of proxy behavior. The authors stated they were looking for guidance on documenting proxy behavior, and the tone of the room was that this type of work should be included. I'd like to start the discussion on getting these issues raised so they can be documented. Thanks tim References: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance/ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-01
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidan… Tim Wicinski