IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC1035 (5915)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 20 December 2019 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B35120113 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:43:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fShAmXF1vTVu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08070120025 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 92BD52B9B2; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:43:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <20191122000302.3D09AF40709@rfc-editor.org> <CAHw9_iL01QrdXT+7_SGVNczRJinGvYUbjB9n2XCd8-k_qcq+sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:43:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iL01QrdXT+7_SGVNczRJinGvYUbjB9n2XCd8-k_qcq+sA@mail.gmail.com> (Warren Kumari's message of "Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:36:12 -0500")
Message-ID: <yblwoar3yf3.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SyENqd3SEa7SIMLq9VRb31b-nLU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC1035 (5915)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:43:32 -0000

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> writes:

> I stumbled across this while cleaning out my mailbox -- I *think* that
> this makes sense, and that I should accept this as Hold For Document
> Update ( https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/
> ) - does anyone disagree?
> If so, please let me know by Jan 5th.

I agree the word "unique" is odd there.  I agree the update seems to
make sense, but it would be sure be good to have the opinion of someone
familiar with the original discussions to ensure we're not missing
something and "unique" was intentional.  (if it is intentional,
clarification text would certainly be good)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email