[DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns0-clientid
Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk> Tue, 22 May 2018 12:50 UTC
Return-Path: <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB70812EB34 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9gtf0yndmQ6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.noware.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2604:a880:0:1010::add:2001]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A3212EB31 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2018 05:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from neil-cook-mbp-8.home (unknown [81.132.248.151]) by mail.noware.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9EF11D1B63 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:49:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_149897B7-81B7-4740-AD59-266797354961"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Message-Id: <3EDC5766-14BE-49A6-8F9B-0C29F7A4463B@noware.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:50:20 +0100
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Ptsdbm83 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VvAueDke9ZPVSYUOt0uBgw==:117 a=VvAueDke9ZPVSYUOt0uBgw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10:nop_no_from_header a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10:nop_no_to_header a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10:nop_no_subject_header a=owNJyecuZOZtWmIKPIoA:9 a=feLE3kp5LJcpCgUy:21 a=leSVz-lz5HXPp7TA:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=XAGprKH1mT58B4jE3cAA:9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/T-lhChXIB4vZd9cRzL2ezooxRfc>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns0-clientid
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:50:25 -0000
Hi Folks, I’m wondering what the status of this draft is? It expired in September last year. Is there still a desire to get this pushed through? We (i.e. Open-Xchange/PowerDNS) are really interested in seeing this become a standard, and personally I’d be happy to take over authorship and drive it through if necessary, but I’m not exactly sure why it died - was there lack of consensus for this, or did it just fall through the cracks? Currently we support the draft in PowerDNS and also a couple of other de-facto standards for supplying mac address, but we’d also like to see this expanded to provide other types of client ID than just mac address and IP, for example a host name. Neil Cook