Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

["Paul Hoffman" <[e-mail]>]

On 31 Aug 2018, at 14:47, Adam Roach wrote:

>>> §5:
>>>> Owner:  The domain name where a RR is found ([RFC1034], Section 
>>>> 3.6).
>>> Nit: "...an RR..." (see RFC 7322 §1, CMOS 10.9)
>> There too.
>
>
> In that case, this definition appears to be missing quotation marks.

Good point. Added.

>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> §6:
>>>
>>>> Privacy-enabling DNS server:  "A DNS server that implements DNS 
>>>> over
>>>>     TLS [RFC7858] and may optionally implement DNS over DTLS
>>>>     [RFC8094]."  (Quoted from [RFC8310], Section 2)
>>> This definition seems incomplete in light of the mechanism defined 
>>> in
>>> draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https.
>> Agree, but it is what we have as a quotation.
>
>
> Other definitions consist of quotations plus additional information 
> (frequently in the form of another quotation). If the notion here is 
> that you don't want to perform any synthesis, I'm sympathetic to that 
> (although other definitions do contain substantial synthesis, so it 
> doesn't seem like a hard-and-fast rule). If that's not the rationale, 
> consider adding explanatory text pointing to DoH. I'm not really 
> bothered either way, though. As Spencer is fond of saying: do the 
> right thing.

Another good point. Added as well.

--Paul Hoffman