[DNSOP] private-use in-meeting chat comments

[Brian Dickson <[e-mail]>]

Comments made in the chat, about the private-use presentation/draft:
Me:
One potential approach is to say (in the RFC) that one of the two-letter
reserved codes should avoid name collision by putting a collision-resistant
second-level label, below .zz and above the private use usage (and use that
particular two-letter code in that manner exclusively).

E.g. whatever-i-want.guid-as-label-to-prevent-collisions.zz rather than
whatever-i-want.zz

Warren:
@Brian: Yes, but as you know (being a registrar), people really want
semantically meaningful names... People have seen using www.corp, not
www.dfads3e4r34324rwefe.corp..

Me:
Correct, and I think possibly providing guidance that this private use
SHOULD be generally limited to "magic" things like automation or
automated/negotiated systems. The UI can/should hide the GUID component and
possibly also the zz TLD

Ben:
That could be $guid.guidspace.arpa, no need for .zz
"guidspace.arpa" is not a thing. I'm just suggesting an adjustment to
Brian's proposal.
Me:
That's a good idea, can be pursued independently of the private-use TLDs
like .zz
(possibly addressing different use cases?)

Brian