[DNSOP] 2 internet drafts relevant to DNSOP

Joseph Gersch <Joe.Gersch@Secure64.com> Thu, 08 March 2012 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Joe.Gersch@Secure64.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D748A21F8639 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:16:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVx9BxpOiOHE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:16:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com (unknown [64.92.221.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4705F21F8555 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:16:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1088BB84BD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:16:00 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secure64.com
Received: from zimbra.secure64.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.secure64.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Na83KAzRPXCb; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:15:59 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.138.15.14] (unknown [192.168.254.4]) by zimbra.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B118B84B6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:15:59 -0700 (MST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=secure64.com; s=2010; t=1331223359; bh=qvWrGmAWaqbD7q/c7FW7EPxzU2voprR76ywAriAZY9w=; h=From:Content-Type:Subject:Date:Message-Id:To:Mime-Version; b=aRS+ n0rj2bVlNfVXEOqeYuPiWFyo4YG2yAnOm7MVQnDzGG9izUSodfoY5ElIKYZiBfdGObn h5OML5OnP2vb/yHUxGqKlC+kAJ9zBj1TCt2vZOrfxPHMHNwTGP9zMN0KI2S9daa9N67 UnD41hVVb8C+7iGiA3gX7NhVM4gnOt/0M=
From: Joseph Gersch <Joe.Gersch@Secure64.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D9A9F525-6679-4EDB-9198-AB69392FD6C8"
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:15:57 -0700
Message-Id: <5E9B2EA9-FE35-49DA-9FB4-9D80A310D5CC@Secure64.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Subject: [DNSOP] 2 internet drafts relevant to DNSOP
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:16:01 -0000

DNSOP members,

   We have recently submitted two internet drafts for review at the Paris IETF meeting.  

   The first document, "draft-gersch-dnsop-revdns-cidr-01" describes a reverse-DNS naming method to specify CIDR address blocks.  We will be presenting this proposal, its motivation and its purpose at the DNSOP session on Friday, March 30.

  The second document, "draft-gersch-grow-revdns-bgp-00" was also submitted.  It describes two new DNS record types that can be used to specify BGP route origins in the reverse DNS.  It uses the domain naming method described earlier.   We will be presenting this at the GROW session on Friday, March 30, and possibly at the SIDR session on Wednesday, March 28 as well.

  Although one of the drafts was submitted to GROW, the documents propose a DNS naming convention and new DNS record types that could benefit from the expert review by the members in DNSEXT and DNSOP.  We encourage you to review these internet drafts  and to submit comments to the DNSOP mailing list.  

  If you want to know more about the use of the names and record types, a live testbed is available at the web site "rover.secure64.com".  This web site contains various documents and slide sets explaining the BGP publishing and verification methods, as well as the testbed itself with over 390,000 routes published in an in-addr.arpa shadow zone.  You can submit your own BGP data into the shadow zones if you wish.   The web site also lets you perform queries to verify the origin authenticity of a BGP announcement.
If anyone wants a demo of the testbed during the IETF week, we will be happy to show how it works; or you can simply create an account and try it out for yourself at any time.

 Thanks,

Joseph Gersch
Dan Massey
Eric Osterweil
Lixia Zhang