IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 06 April 2016 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25ED12D549 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIe9Lcy7uYjd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCECA12D53C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id E76C13283C; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:59:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97499F01289; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:58:24 -0300
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Message-ID: <20160406175824.GA1386@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAKr6gn3rLUWD+qbKzOpqJ4a8RkA20HHmcQZ7jyNqbB5n+a5N=w@mail.gmail.com> <20160406172209.GA29730@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CAKr6gn1paX05WgQhX43TBjJahhv3ExKHgW4KeJ49+LH7=H7hWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1paX05WgQhX43TBjJahhv3ExKHgW4KeJ49+LH7=H7hWA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 15.10 (wily)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U6u4SquhBulPe1vE1elrL087DK4>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:59:07 -0000

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:33:28PM -0300,
 George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote 
 a message of 38 lines which said:

> I meant a form of signing, which would be a strong signal of
> repudiation of the label as well as exclusion of other holders of
> the label, so that it could be a first-class signal "not in the DNS"
> -> look in another internet-name lookup mechanism.

A ND bit (NS = Not in DNS), as a flag in a NXDOMAIN response, would
not be signed with DNSSEC, so it requires a new kind of NSEC...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email