IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Reminder: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse ends Tonight

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 07 October 2016 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE9A1295E2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQcuTMPV6NSe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C7EA12951E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id o68so46711800qkf.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rcgYAbSxk+xwzNs8rsP9YsTwwDt0MnZ/btj6XzW6zIo=; b=H6pXyiQwmt+6qjKzfPIEAvJAW+tGyUa1lriPiKK6kDeXnLUitRKRaAb+bGD0fsFGfM T45LCMqOdGPErgMQy2EkoYszk58rVzOrWuC/EaMS/qoHsdZDS4MWoDGDJDTYo4G5NdXO 7Q31oNpMqNG5LYwsa87jLGrsVkPu/1kPxYgje7ghJfIVtsNw1GCOMBcdAau1aaznnyWx HjXfMF0ZfdK2Bao9QUqRbW3OGz2mvfCptBwHNUoclo0SKbcYwYIgIqITKAkKfMfrBcKf pQ3WrcKXRzxN7/lFP+rJOFYOADe1EppWG3UUJFqrvpyFJJJlj9gDupp8ppg7Jhql73A1 JbPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rcgYAbSxk+xwzNs8rsP9YsTwwDt0MnZ/btj6XzW6zIo=; b=dpVqUdB4IDIUFLuU93hhMDSANaCcN4CbJUUp4IJ5EIJOSCap4qd9NxLdxPxNpcvuo8 YlA7rBHM2xWcIIsd37YXVHiMu+PERmFPtSjzIFbyIM/6nohUArdlU2DMh843JZ4FVFL1 Jf+cadzQDlesrzI9H2uqZQCRaXjoHo4H8zNRYwoynSymalXJUZH3Iwtykj7Wyh3m11mv ZMZw5MatSBuujOzFn/Whq7sdByFaCdygPtfeS1w/FrSO9KPYQen7JIo1Fj7afFQiHG7O Eg5CjchechWtAT0QTOPv6MgtVkVrxh2fBAGALjcqXwO0B3uPCwmN2qUIuE+DvhMOK9RI xi1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rnmlve742L3g1waVDgq//hYW8CtJsTTy2ALYK6AxboHA3V+39vIN89hWcOYKTkV883WL5Pu3iDDA5T33DMg
X-Received: by 10.55.22.140 with SMTP id 12mr19239043qkw.236.1475855961773; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.147.196 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iL7ry0b+1gLVOAumE8GsyuKnptcqE7cM-hRVhs3gWfq4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1fc274b9-2164-1933-54e3-ce47ff48c8a3@gmail.com> <c94b52b3-28d0-1be3-77a4-d84b258984f0@pletterpet.nl> <CAHw9_iL7ry0b+1gLVOAumE8GsyuKnptcqE7cM-hRVhs3gWfq4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 11:58:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKBJ_UMmTrXdHyd7bdokALu+q3JO32qcpk=4V+6nLOF2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U8uZgGVyMOHH4UMDU2IHz8htn48>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Reminder: WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse ends Tonight
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:59:25 -0000

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06-10-16 08:53, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a reminder that the WGLC for  draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
>>> will end later today (barring any stuck issues).  The authors appear to
>>> have addressed all open issues (except JINMEI's last comments).  Please
>>> read the current version here:
>>
>> I don't think my issues have been addressed in -03, except for the
>> bikeshedding Pull Request has been merged.
>
> Whoops, I got so excited by the pull req

(.... apparently *really* excited, because I sent this before
finishing the reply!. Continuing....)

Whoops, I got so excited by the pull request that I skipped over the
rest of your mail :-)
I had removed the positive responses bit, but the WG seems to still
want it, so I'll be re-adding it. I think that that voids your
comment, but *please* let me know if I'm wrong -- I *hope* to publish
a new version later today, or possibly Sunday.

W

>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>   Matthijs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse/
>>>
>>> and speak up with any final questions, concerns, etc.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> tim
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email