IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Call for adoption: draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg-rules-08 (Ends 2026-08-31)

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Fri, 14 August 2026 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F4E129F60C6 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1786730377; bh=ZrDy+oB+ZGOfcfuILxn2aUtvsyOYKfuFhCNpcBccaDc=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=tRbcmM97hPhUqqaJVSxGC8zJgodGtjat4UEnUYhd0uQE0pmAbvKdlmJiHLezKgnov 5gsxJwvD1Sxk3oWf/qXMAWvlEs4TForZjEDcXUhpOwUea8x7SMqwLMGgNeRYR1JPVE niX+CK581sbX+eimyQQOm42zw57qvCYJYlcA7VRI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFDjgkfT5akO for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FF6129F6079 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-92e55b62640so67522485a.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; t=1786730375; x=1787335175; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:content-type :message-id:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=8W82x2kaDVH/TIMRuuQoFBlAHApAJUWjUtbcSTK2J/M=; b=S2qDlwfXqEYnGxvE80LmnRUGAcse5pebRhwDH3+uUlzU6tKRdtP3r2JLXiWH38lELF x98m8dDH6q8RYByxxQ/rRwrjqN1rked3il7wG8wI8RD4RJU1UUIHF8qxy7NSvRXu6B1r 5rrPLqtsNdlMb3sMCDIIdb3oNGAuZLatLF2qw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1786730375; x=1787335175; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:content-type :message-id:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=8W82x2kaDVH/TIMRuuQoFBlAHApAJUWjUtbcSTK2J/M=; b=sFZD38QZA9C/upPN+3U+Y8bgijJt5syf2gwl2n9JfQV4oMDPS0glnRB335qfPco8Qc m87KBPzAI3Yf2T1SAKhOIrQdTS6+ZwJvRv2wDfoRq7Ac7tV9QcIgZ1vJQNRU7wh+C0pY zQA6F5i3XwYYMmA+Z49F/CrD7VqPtqZaaVGYkH0ruH7bkRHjN0wBQqmpO8VzZcjTxS39 TgePE966LlzCPu0k+CoXbOtMuxtW3g200fXLpL2LyQd0s4MCFPP1QaHm3HRdqw7RwIJA zJLX+SWpqvSa7B9TGA2/eyK5jkPmbSxMGqmhvRAGzlzhNJh6MyoiTKQ5NK1Chc4qqPgp iNfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwcZY7HPGJvpSBooW27ygHom0dMpilwP7R+eP5XNWdDlNOZWlU oy914O8DZ2Z6YePHHzHE9suEszp/VLEHk5kSirWEUDW0BmxvwLZfTyHJp7zZU9px1fU=
X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10VllSuy+j/OvIUrUxEevthMphnPaIVa/AvDOr4zlNRMBfTnSMnvwiMSU0JYkO IJYZ5X56VsFfRALQwhhEq9Dd445JapPl3Qu/skfcNiqyZpj2T/MdWhvZy889pPvoKPxTCn4qhj/ VW9qCptiTWc0NQXry0H//3gfYRJffEbcxoDzLyFraHUmUBxIQDkOhiuvupbEHu17QKw8paq4rCp +LIK2yIid12+uK7Hl8QSW7tvdkcEo2/SCnXhHaLCheTa1cXdE+FV1EcxeRgHb9RTQvMrkkkkluc SXWU+iQDCmye1bs1RhNqK3arrWgydZ9SXXwJEntlEuWYVhISewA8zYAnQSlTx2v/p0g62ndcjNj 6NseeiCR9Qc16g24Pie6Vp0Jn03Fgl/Yaa3V44WzImbogMuaaC1K1XcD38eIe5gPT5nSFKJ3lU7 UuTsX05Y+jVeMgODqFKzK+QouKXeSlwZ3pTOUo/5swH0H92QzepCWXaorOPZVgMH4r+o+VuQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e51a:0:b0:92e:e3eb:de54 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-936d201e8c4mr767135585a.11.1786730375201; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([130.41.36.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-936cdf55756sm325278885a.3.2026.08.14.10.59.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
Message-Id: <4301FCA1-FF31-4994-9FBA-C29447F33CB8@dnss.ec>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C1F470E-DF30-4F6B-9C87-589BD8F78048"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.700.51.1.1\))
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:59:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <m1wuvoz-0000O0C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
References: <m1wun5n-0000MtC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <3BB93087-2B8C-4CCC-8432-0E9653F8BA0D@dnss.ec> <m1wuvoz-0000O0C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.700.51.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: AH6BEWARDD7SKIPC23DS3QYZOQYTEBQI
X-Message-ID-Hash: AH6BEWARDD7SKIPC23DS3QYZOQYTEBQI
X-MailFrom: roy@dnss.ec
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg-rules@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Call for adoption: draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg-rules-08 (Ends 2026-08-31)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UBgUsODgp6hh-LZKup0Hm_Am5VQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>


> On 14 Aug 2026, at 18:35, Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-7@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
>> I therefore dont think we should introduce a generic preference
>> for PQC algorithms in this draft. We have a process in RFC9904 for
>> introducing new and deprecating old algorithms.
> 
> It was not my intention to express a preference for PQC or whether we
> should use pure or hybrid, or whether validators should prefer PQC. That
> is all a discussion for later. And, as in Joe's draft, a local preference.
> 
> What I wanted to bring up is that the multi-alg draft may interfere with
> with the ability to have a preference at all. So I think we should study that
> and figure out a way forward.

Ack, thanks for the clarification, Philip!

Roy

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status