IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Status of IDNA

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D041243FE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=nFwPx3mX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=kJvAY8t+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2iiZpVr1kSm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404FB12786A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94975BD996 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 23:45:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1492040741; bh=qMh/9B1lMdz/LU5sRXrRL0g2sXK7KDtb1Adw2LucfW4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nFwPx3mXrZ+8q8e0SpF2PYIrpQb1rpaE11//fc0qhDaw5xdkt/YzcIaBYBPWz9n9m KbTWqN1Pu+ZRUPcUOWxC/CHyUA8BvgAYgAs2fHoGF9v8jpu37vRKmY7TEa4SeKeW3n VH/PFp3QFDef16irWehHROIR0rFMsu0QYv8eKXjM=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8nwvvpXIOcN for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 23:45:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:45:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1492040740; bh=qMh/9B1lMdz/LU5sRXrRL0g2sXK7KDtb1Adw2LucfW4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kJvAY8t+dpp0sClOHSeRuC4rK6Dhtt46mLQm0GmYzzBKGc9fMM4pzIS2IZgWcysIb bcLC07fyEknp3OVExva2eW/jMELJ3kyIfevJmBI9zASN5kMxNPyJdGr6EcJeghNHVH iHDnc11qbHcLRVU5OB/n9f0xvEQEhM5VdJXrRX7U=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170412234541.GE6085@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <d087f7d0-5def-8700-c1f3-f0fb53adf698@redhat.com> <20170412154713.GX25754@mournblade.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170412154713.GX25754@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UxGlLqbssSgeqERlkPOoAOdYK4Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Status of IDNA
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 23:46:16 -0000

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:47:14PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Just move on to non-transitional UTS#46.

Given that its mappings include many emojis, which aren't allowed
under either IDNA2003 or IDNA2008, I think there is an apparent
problem with UTS#46 too.  One might be forgiven for wondering why the
UTC decided that it knew something about domain names and the history
of how they are used.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email