IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Extended CNAME (ENAME)

Chris Thompson <cet1@cam.ac.uk> Tue, 20 May 2014 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCCA1A068E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QK7kJOzCdm6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51-v6.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA35B1A068D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 04:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:54633) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:cet1) id 1WmiaQ-0002DO-YY (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 20 May 2014 12:52:02 +0100
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:cet1) id 1WmiaQ-0004kr-KT (Exim 4.72) (return-path <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 20 May 2014 12:52:02 +0100
Received: from [131.111.56.28] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 20 May 2014 12:52:02 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:52:02 +0100
From: Chris Thompson <cet1@cam.ac.uk>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1405201252020.30993@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20140520091013.51373161D8FE@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <mailman.81.1400353284.24808.dnsop@ietf.org> <21370.33215.875300.671179@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <4B289B9D-1710-403F-8C45-156D1D3AA5A8@nominum.com> <537AD201.8010008@redbarn.org> <829C54BC-A637-4935-A69A-6FDFF78AEC0C@frobbit.se> <20140520091013.51373161D8FE@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: Chris Thompson <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/V3dPUz9jP1mphTVFfFk85IU8oFE
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Extended CNAME (ENAME)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cet1@cam.ac.uk
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:52:08 -0000

On May 20 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:

>I've updated draft-andrews-http-srv-02.
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-http-srv-02

Wouldn't it be desirable to say something about https URIs as well as
http ones? It would seem that we will need an _https._tcp.[name] SRV
RRSet as well as the _http._srv.[name] one. (The idea of https overriding
the port number(s) in the _http._srv.[name] records with 443 seems
too horrible to contemplate.)

-- 
Chris Thompson               University of Cambridge Information Services,
Email: cet1@uis.cam.ac.uk    Roger Needham Building, 7 JJ Thomson Avenue,
Phone: +44 1223 334715       Cambridge CB3 0RB, United Kingdom.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email