IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: (with COMMENT)

Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org> Wed, 06 January 2016 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2357A1B2BB1; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 05:49:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lvnil9IjQgDJ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 05:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DB81B2BAA; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 05:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BF521FCABC; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:49:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CF0160045; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07B1160075; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id dnwd979BjKU4; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rays-mbp.local (unknown [46.227.151.81]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A63A7160045; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160106134609.4675.52245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
Message-ID: <568D1B5C.8060205@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 13:49:16 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160106134609.4675.52245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VK2Hzl_MXSigqV3NQe89XZJJVIg>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, rick.casarez@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 13:49:25 -0000

On 06/01/2016 13:46, Benoit Claise wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I was slightly surprised by "implementation requirements" in the title.
> If we write a RFC, we hopefully hope/require future implementations,
> right?
> I understand the willingness to change as little text as possible
> compared RFC5966, but I would welcome the following update:

The rationale for the original text in RFC 5966 was that whilst how to
use TCP was already *specified*, it was often taken as not *required to
implement*.

IMHO, your proposed alternate text loses that distinction.

kind regards,

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email