Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 21 December 2017 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E78126CD6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:20:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36b5dhzMXRUk for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F0E120727 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 58221281803; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 51A7E281808; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD45281803; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A6D6427580; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38C1F3FD8A; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:20:10 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171221162010.yzln6hd6ciz4ft3c@nic.fr>
References: <8CB86DAB-B80E-469A-9BDA-7F1361634933@vpnc.org> <20171218135211.nul66bgdxczmg4lp@nic.fr> <160A1E3B-0ABA-4A22-9128-0ED5B8577F87@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <160A1E3B-0ABA-4A22-9128-0ED5B8577F87@fugue.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000004, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.12.21.160616
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VqGPXKrLVqkMEEiP7zT2kXCaFis>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Global DNS and Private DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:20:14 -0000
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote a message of 176 lines which said: > Now that I've attempted to compose this reply, it seems to me, and > perhaps was obvious to other readers more quickly because they're at > 20kft and not 1ft on this, that your real point is that the document > should not privilege ICANN over OpenNIC. If so, you should say > that directly Please do not tell me what is my real point. I know my real point (even if it is not always expressed clearly). When it comes to non-technical issue, the draft says, when defining TLD, that "the division [between ccTLD and gTLD] is a matter of policy, and beyond the scope of this document." This is the right approach. The fact that the root is managed by ICANN or OpenNIC or whatever is beyond the scope of this document.
- [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Glo… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Glo… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Glo… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: Glo… Andrew Sullivan