Re: [DNSOP] RFC 7477 on Child-to-Parent Synchronization in DNS
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 23 March 2015 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6E21AD365 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPZaVKaljqOR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E351AD35B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-8e1a.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.142.26]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6506C315B3; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
References: <CA+nkc8DbSgQiqA+bqvyC-wViqaiEuT2gsgDf1kM3t_otGkwQJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:12 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8DbSgQiqA+bqvyC-wViqaiEuT2gsgDf1kM3t_otGkwQJA@mail.gmail.com> (Bob Harold's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:37:52 -0400")
Message-ID: <0lsicvo7zz.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X0y1EHjprM6DG32YsjdC9Ly92_A>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 7477 on Child-to-Parent Synchronization in DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:59:16 -0000
Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> writes: > My apologies for not seeing this sooner. In section "5. Security > Considerations": Hi Bob, I've been stewing over this one in my head for a few days since I saw your message. In short: I agree with you and am now slapping myself silly. I suspect as is it's not "awful", but not ideal. I'm not sure an errata would be sufficient for such a change and if it'd be allowed for such a major processing change. I'll speak to some people about it this week and see what others say. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons