IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 03 November 2021 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCE53A13C6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icq1EF6aNjsa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A1C3A13CB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id x9so2374880ilu.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=TLFHCkdCtQQYk+xNzhyZNYwJxnxBziOTMA0NtnYZwPc=; b=JVSjimPEnYHH6W6MLzld6xTh9axGCWia/MK2HNcADqGus+p3dHam2FJYWaNkuoku4i HljmsPqIqAmJB4pIAwfLzdqhUtdJw2PII0cXbR0/kuAWxAT3ROqPVMgPkPdtupqUrdTi JFNkVD8aXvtaOtiME3OPpLZT30vI58GmAlHdk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=TLFHCkdCtQQYk+xNzhyZNYwJxnxBziOTMA0NtnYZwPc=; b=jALZ+INERXUfb4RaurmHGTYv3rIDwckqcactY2eHV7+fY3rlVP0LNH/tf+Mc8fAxNB RwYq/uE01CsKB9HBMs5BLn9UZUdI+GGfS3jufgcmKOv+89kt4RLcpGWPLLjlP9fjhILf 9OEjsXAJuoOzL4x3LKWEgJofOJlVDmW0g2g2mhdTpuHTvM+RNnzdg4NyF/xZOc0rk2Cc Q42de1070mLPge043LL6o1kd9M9iqSDwvLJib3+9/EwkKDifqgdtc8JWoq/7xQNCchK7 vXHLqI7B7mgOmXJCaJgaych+wDzh/hu42XkS5y9xyPnusV8g04oGhgdXSWbEKv3/5RWU aCQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fvfmNNyQj7tP5laxc+7dTPGMSeBTF/3/ZrRs/0g/xNz73ajNL B5TO3QkiqO4CYQgm2xD4Cmbr9w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqrhFd8xtDcTydh3vXEWqrDXoLukmXxu88wdapHpMGqUVxGHH+RPnpM/mH+mbyD6D10aZSvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c56b:: with SMTP id b11mr18790312ilj.243.1635943766845; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (23-233-20-74.cpe.pppoe.ca. [23.233.20.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm1135735ilj.41.2021.11.03.05.49.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 08:49:24 -0400
Message-Id: <62C15C79-D942-441F-8B16-566BF0A875D6@hopcount.ca>
References: <BN1P110MB093928DC42042BAE008E28C3DC8B9@BN1P110MB0939.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Cc: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BN1P110MB093928DC42042BAE008E28C3DC8B9@BN1P110MB0939.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19B74)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X3ZVOH5z7N2Cmw6tQmh4Bmfjxvo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 12:49:35 -0000

On Nov 2, 2021, at 16:00, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

> I believe that if this draft is going to be the BCP to discuss DNS over TCP, all of the flavors of DNS over TCP need to be covered.

I think it's sloppy to characterise DoH as a flavour of DNS over TCP, given that the H part doesn't necessarily involve TCP at all (and often doesn't in practice, for some ecosystems of clients and servers).

If there is any concern about DoH not receiving equitable treatment compared to DoT, I think it's sufficient simply to observe that DoH is a horse of a different colour and move on. 


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email