Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 10 November 2017 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB103126CE8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7BmoVRptdGIA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B131120046 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yYNDX4TmVzB2B; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:47:40 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1510325260; bh=+/ZVKSkI5MlQ0aPiL7t5jLFm5ul5m8jlsTcHK7RFz1k=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=LEgrW3JF6pcYDONyS5/biUzCFGHfWRJCoUgtZqoIslViZNdTT1qoesR1sC8qSUY+b SuWP+e2IjWfZHcWmQ5f5Hy4X8wMLIYNZstMl/gJMGMaV4PcrOZI+HWZdiZu+zP/K5/ cp4iuuMu1FSTpOcsIgJMzWp07f9lsAwfnpDrnaBg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czOVvcGMaZYH; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:47:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:47:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.10.11.24] (unknown [1.186.85.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0A4262D29; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:47:37 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca D0A4262D29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15A432)
In-Reply-To: <20171110142508.GA4062@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:17:34 +0530
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A85950D8-499F-4A83-A4C0-56B035AA8E37@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+HJyM5aUe4UpmU3vuzjaqOkzvC1+_bpvYd=dv93yzAewg@mail.gmail.com> <20171110121600.GA2749@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <EC0E4D2D-E9B1-4A1A-B3D5-24AD672DAFC0@nohats.ca> <20171110142508.GA4062@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YYy_fC9m5oF6fRsjvGR1eOVl9tU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:47:45 -0000

The ENS developer said so in response to my question.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2017, at 19:55, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>; wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +0530,
> Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>; wrote 
> a message of 29 lines which said:
> 
>> It takes 4 out of 7 geeks to bypass the blockchain in case of
>> emergency, court orders or kneecaps.
>> 
>> According to the presentation held at ICANN60
> 
> Well, if someone at ICANN said so, someone is wrong (or, at the
> minimum, over-simplificator).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop