IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: PQ DNSSEC?

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 20 July 2026 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71E911A54C9D for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1784549197; bh=hJPyW//uZmw3Is4V3w+BVNIcKvSCUyIE3rHUgPm+Wh8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Ln7Vh2/ef+c+SGfflfRsZEBoZv5FFkSacrxLzzf8PphoeX1YWOUI/64rWF0xOwWrN fTnutgRqUZ3p8mKIynpYiFXt1GL+jHzK+SeD4WSoWFDmEMSIt2vMLW++9X+8ohzH7M R8rwHZIPHvCkPC1K5gIeoRf0mUXTdq3+0xcYpNu8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9R6lGEqLwU5f for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:4b8::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA4B11A54C99 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:f838:1da9:5334:251f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E6AD2614EB; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <al4JwazLqyoXrtQD@registro.br>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:06:24 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4B8EB34A-6C1C-425E-96A7-4443FF306168@rfc1035.com>
References: <CAMjbhoWSTwExS1+gJkijLQxD+9koO7dtO=Cdf6DCem=MqKhK6g@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cn7=2cms=mx5VkTQiUWEsF7P5SHfAtEeX2a=zEqV0biDw@mail.gmail.com> <4a791841-7722-aa78-67e7-bf3115cebffa@nohats.ca> <al4JwazLqyoXrtQD@registro.br>
To: Frederico A C Neves <fneves=40registro.br@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (shaun.rfc1035.com); Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID-Hash: 2PGJD4DH7OFQZUAINGLFLYTU3NXICSMY
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2PGJD4DH7OFQZUAINGLFLYTU3NXICSMY
X-MailFrom: jim@rfc1035.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: PQ DNSSEC?
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Yt2YeWkMPmghEbS45eMo0Tu6rss>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>


> On 20 Jul 2026, at 12:42, Frederico A C Neves <fneves=40registro.br@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> The question is will we succeed on time and does DoQ has better prognostics of lower failure
> rates than Do53 over TCP???

It depends. We'll never know for sure until someone does the experiments.

Says me making a statementof the bleedin' obvious.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status