Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft-mekking-dnsop-auto-cpsync-00
"Stephan Lagerholm" <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com> Wed, 30 June 2010 13:25 UTC
Return-Path: <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC3828C0D0 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xH8xYcTkN5yc for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.secure64.com (mail.secure64.com [66.37.130.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4C33A69B3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.secure64.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 568DF12578C49; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:25:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from exchange.secure64.com (exchange.secure64.com [192.168.254.250]) by mail.secure64.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202A7C3B1472; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:25:50 -0600 (MDT)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:25:48 -0600
Message-ID: <DD056A31A84CFC4AB501BD56D1E14BBB826C10@exchange.secure64.com>
In-Reply-To: <62CC4714954D4674A04FC5F9718E1D89@local>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft-mekking-dnsop-auto-cpsync-00
Thread-Index: AcsYQFa+mIqnCFN2Qe2OX90sWwqYTAAFdAIg
References: <4C29F2FA.1000907@nlnetlabs.nl> <62CC4714954D4674A04FC5F9718E1D89@local>
From: Stephan Lagerholm <stephan.lagerholm@secure64.com>
To: George Barwood <george.barwood@blueyonder.co.uk>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft-mekking-dnsop-auto-cpsync-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:25:42 -0000
Hi Goerge, What I like about your approach is the fact that is takes advantage of DNSSEC. My opinion is that if DNSSEC is so great it would be cool if we can define an update mechanism that utilizes it. This could be the first real world application for DNSSEC. I would encourage some type of notification mechanism so that the parent doesn't have to poll blindly. Also, why not use a DNSKEY with another flag to announce the availability of a new key instead of a new RR? Similar to what RFC5011 is doing for a revoked key. Thanks, S ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephan Lagerholm Senior DNS Architect, M.Sc. ,CISSP Secure64 Software Corporation, www.secure64.com Cell: 469-834-3940 > -----Original Message----- > From: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > George Barwood > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:37 AM > To: Matthijs Mekking; dnsop@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft-mekking-dnsop- > auto-cpsync-00 > > I'd like to encourage some discussion of the relative merits of the UPDATE > approach > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mekking-dnsop-auto-cpsync-00.txt > > compared to the publication approach outlined in the recent draft at > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-barwood-dnsop-ds-publish-00.txt > > I haven't yet done a well-considered analysis, and maybe this would be > better > undertaken by others, but here are some of my immediate thoughts: > > I think the publication approach is somewhat simpler, at least for the > child zone. > It's very simple for signing software (including off-line signers) to > generate the "CDS" RRset. > Since there are many more child zones than parent zones, this seems > significant. > > The publication approach leverages the in-built redundancy of DNS slave > servers > for transmitting information, and seems closer to the normal DNS method of > operation. > > I also like the ability to simply check whether the parent and child DS > RRset > are properly synchronised. > > I'm a bit doubtful about the complications of setting up additional secret > keys for UPDATE. > > Regards, > George > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfor draf… Wolfgang Nagele
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-m… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfor draf… Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: NewVersion Notificationfor draft… Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: NewVersion Notificationfor draft… Wolfgang Nagele
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfor draf… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraf… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Stephan Lagerholm
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: NewVersion Notificationfor draft… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraf… Wolfgang Nagele
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraf… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraf… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Wolfgang Nagele
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraf… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Wolfgang Nagele
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Jakob Schlyter
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notificationfordraft… Jakob Schlyter
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… bmanning