Re: [DNSOP] summary of the discussion of draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 09 November 2009 04:59 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981C63A6936 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.324
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhyFbF2DlXPM for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (bortzmeyer-1-pt.tunnel.tserv10.par1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f12:420::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC093A690F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 818A09557E; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:59:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by horcrux (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9FBD157767; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:52:45 +0900
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: YAO Jiankang <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Message-ID: <20091109045245.GA14544@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <028e01ca60d7$96af33a0$01125d85@whatisfuture>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <028e01ca60d7$96af33a0$01125d85@whatisfuture>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 8.10 (intrepid)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary of the discussion of draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:59:22 -0000
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 08:57:18AM +0800, YAO Jiankang <yaojk@cnnic.cn> wrote a message of 128 lines which said: > solution 3 and solution 4 may cause the potential data > inconsistencies in the IDN TLD variant zone since the policy can not > be granted in all the levels. Cannot be guaranteed BY TECHNICAL MEANS. You can still use layer-8 or layer-9 methods to get the consistency, if desired. Since IETF provides protocols, not policies, this is not a problem for me. > 2. remove the solution 3 and 4 -1. I would understand this removal if these solutions had a TECHNICAL flaw. But I don't think it is the case.
- [DNSOP] summary of the discussion of draft-yao-dn… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [DNSOP] summary of the discussion of draft-ya… Stephane Bortzmeyer