IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 11 November 2002 21:50 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03227 for <dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:50:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gABLYqcE017586 for <dnsop-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:34:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id gABLYqO3017585 for dnsop-outgoing; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:34:52 +0100 (MET)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-dnsop@cafax.se using -f
Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gABLYpcE017580 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:34:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rip.psg.com.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BMCo-000OmK-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:34:50 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@sun.com>
Cc: dns op wg <dnsop@cafax.se>
Subject: Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
References: <200211101351.gAADprl12802@astro.cs.utk.edu> <20021110170654.D1EEF7AF@starfruit.itojun.org> <E18AvhV-0006ib-00@rip.psg.com> <3DCFB06F.B82A214C@hursley.ibm.com> <3DCFFBC6.4060000@sun.com>
Message-Id: <E18BMCo-000OmK-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:34:50 -0800
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[ v6ops removed from cc: ]

> I have some comments about section 3.1 "6to4 NS records derived
> from IPv4 NS records" when 6to4 is deployed by end users.
> Who is going to get the delegation: the ISP or the end customers?

as far down the tree as it can go.  and note that the current
version
  <http://psg.com/~randy/draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.html>
makes this a bit clearer.

> End customers will only deploy 6to4 because their ISP does not
> support IPv6 yet.
> Is it reasonable to expect the same ISP to manage the IPv6
> reverse DNS zone?

see the revised section

randy

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email