Re: [DNSOP] WGLC 2010-08-14: draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-04.txt

Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl> Tue, 10 August 2010 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <hsalgado@nic.cl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116BD3A6A0F for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.940, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzMP42lvStcH for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (mail.nic.cl [200.1.123.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4493A67B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82521CC82CA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:12:03 -0400 (CLT)
Received: from pepino.intra.nic.cl (hsalgado-vpn.intra.nic.cl [172.30.14.17]) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB77CC82C8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:12:03 -0400 (CLT)
Message-ID: <4C60D18E.8070404@nic.cl>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:11:58 -0400
From: Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20100729130002.4D4F928C164@core3.amsl.com> <D48EE994-0324-4B27-95AF-E0F5154773F9@hopcount.ca> <20100802163853.GD29796@x27.adm.denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <20100802163853.GD29796@x27.adm.denic.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on Tue Aug 10 00:12:03 2010 -0400 (CLT)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC 2010-08-14: draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:11:31 -0000

On 08/02/2010 12:38 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
> Dear DNSOP WG,
>
> as requested by the document editors, this message initiates a
> working group last call for
>
>>> 	Title           : AS112 Nameserver Operations
>>> 	Author(s)       : J. Abley, W. Maton
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-04.txt
>
> for publication as an Informational RFC.
>
> Please send comments to this list by 2010-08-14.
> The chairs believe there has been substantive support for this
> draft so that silence will be counted as consent.

I have reviewed the document, and I wonder if it would be a good idea
to add a NSID configuration directive, in section 3.5.
I think that is preferred over a TXT rr to identify an anycast node (or
at least a complement).

Regards,

Hugo