IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] new draft: 'NSEC(3) TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use' (New Version Notification for draft-vandijk-dnsop-nsec-ttl-00.txt)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 09 December 2020 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C2B3A0A97 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGCEKfrowVUL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588193A0A50 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.5]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 0B9Lsw32028221 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:54:59 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.721.2; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:54:57 -0800
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0721.004; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:54:57 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] new draft: 'NSEC(3) TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use' (New Version Notification for draft-vandijk-dnsop-nsec-ttl-00.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHWznXvOfLl8UFCMEKLEJxX0rkPzQ==
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:54:57 +0000
Message-ID: <C47C93AE-7B13-4978-969C-ACD8B2F7EFD2@icann.org>
References: <160616178406.24526.15858981444327414727@ietfa.amsl.com> <ca6217f45a8b3be86fb62f4967a342bb50b241a0.camel@powerdns.com> <8744910612b4f139f57493a3d331218a6b014a1f.camel@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <8744910612b4f139f57493a3d331218a6b014a1f.camel@powerdns.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B9C7456B-7513-4FDB-BCDB-25A52FB67A62"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-09_18:2020-12-09, 2020-12-09 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dHyqEVrkfskjVTolpExJVSepa_o>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] new draft: 'NSEC(3) TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use' (New Version Notification for draft-vandijk-dnsop-nsec-ttl-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:55:38 -0000

On Dec 9, 2020, at 1:34 PM, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello DNSOP,
> 
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 21:16 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>> please find below my draft that updates one
>> sentence in 4034 and the ~same sentence in 5155. As far as I can see,
>> no correction to 8198 is necessary or useful.
> 
> I believe this draft is non-controversial. I am inclined to see the lack of response as a lack of controversy as well.

Errrr, that was why I didn't respond: it is uncontroversial. I guess I should have said "Good catch! This update should be made to the docs listed".

> Chairs, I believe this document could go through the motions to publication quite quickly if no objections appear. Can I request a call for adoption please?

I support this being a quick WG document. I will contribute (likely minor) text and will review.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email