Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-03.txt
Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 13 September 2022 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC62C157B3B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redbarn.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMwZEUzalJvu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from util.redbarn.org (util.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E549BC157B5E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by util.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8A5167CDA; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=redbarn.org; s=util; t=1663079981; bh=fb24MwuFW0OwHFad3iStXG09hPn5msvnqcHWjbYO2tM=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=Prc7llVpX0swJfO2+qqtjqQ7XW2I2iXjy07zBCC42g0kLB98wuxH7XqarJrIvDwQ0 ib7RAun9T0UkNd9p/UTD4j/QTa0r+5pi1M38UbL/Cl5IZk2CQ/FQBWhAeCHHb3eNPY 54ep4IPnqOWcLrif6/60dpXHNhhNh2oyi6s3mK/0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D38C40B7; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:39:41 +0000
Message-Id: <CMVCNG0V3IOR.2BD050DBS042P@family.redbarn.org>
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: aerc 0.12.0
References: <166251411453.51793.7893145834491865444@ietfa.amsl.com> <a8b7e07e-c11e-f8a7-7552-f61edc83adda@isc.org> <CADyWQ+FUgD+1Hj6RwWN8f-i=gi8Ao0tpHX4rzy7CWsKfik1gJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+FUgD+1Hj6RwWN8f-i=gi8Ao0tpHX4rzy7CWsKfik1gJw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/drHHjJgWkesb2xu8Vp76RmehB74>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:40:07 -0000
On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 1:47 PM UTC, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This is good feedback, and it helps us. We should also hear from > other implementers about their opinion on this. in an unreleased recursive name server, all parts of resimprove were implemented as of 2005 or so, which is what led to the publication of the original resimprove draft a few years later. i don't think this qualifies the authors and operators of that software as "implementers" as used in the above request, but if so, let me say i don't need it to be mandatory. see also my reply up-thread speaking as a draft co-author.
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidat… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Vixie