IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Debugging DNSSEC SERVFAILs on resolver side

Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <pspacek@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874A71B35BA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id seqQBuGk6Uwh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD521B35B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C523C36360A; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:40:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pspacek.brq.redhat.com (pspacek.brq.redhat.com [10.34.128.7]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t536eG2a030716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jun 2015 02:40:17 -0400
Message-ID: <556EA150.9070408@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:40:16 +0200
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, Pier Carlo Chiodi <pierky@pierky.com>
References: <54DB64BC.2020102@redhat.com> <debf337e31e1202620df1368dc4a2c97@pierky.com> <20150211160813.GB53392@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150211160813.GB53392@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eAtt9F3NA9bi9L41vhwdgOUWH74>
Cc: Tomas Hozza <thozza@redhat.com>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Debugging DNSSEC SERVFAILs on resolver side
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:40:20 -0000

On 11.2.2015 17:08, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:44:31PM +0100, Pier Carlo Chiodi wrote:
>>> Wild idea: Could it be solved by adding more information to SERVFAIL 
>>> answer?
>>
>> a draft was proposed with this very topic, but it's expired now:
>>
>>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hunt-dns-server-diagnostics/
> 
> I'd be happy to revive it, especially now that it's explicitly within
> dnsop's remit.  I don't recall anyone objecting to the idea; it just
> wasn't high-urgency and I had other business to attend to.

Could this be added to agenda for IETF 93? Does it make sense to discuss it there?

-- 
Petr Spacek  @  Red Hat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email