IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW

Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org> Fri, 19 July 2019 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <kevin@iseclab.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3706C120603 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.594
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DRUGS_ERECTILE=1.994, GB_PHARMACY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=0.1, URI_NOVOWEL=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iseclab.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GZt99MAFNcaX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685F6120155 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id c14so15017270plo.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iseclab.org; s=mail; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=oT1vYbJHA7eaM3O0BJjvf8OIUVUsjSlbeMghXKKbsyM=; b=hS01SjC5qeJ6dNegaphsZZxOikVc4AYjqRuvOVHB+y+aX+xiNq0vdIxQ/H/sL4HDsZ iK3rkgoPyADIBcqyKj45MGx0Q/pUJnwTyNyg69Oqishv4yKLeFQhJU2gqSzGtGeyG9Zy pDEsNU1Xz/XREVe+uxlKFPD/9VxAuSpH3l2LN7jmvwaaRJQJUu4btSt3Zy8newVLVujk D6BuZ3MUaiETBww9UBOJsgs5BZBj6uIzP5IhiRDvrboccxgjXJruuGP0QMpT8UySgwLk MC2DzbYdwRtKqqZmeQch3rw5m8WdDB1rhaRNVUctuUrHEog1cFUXDBta63bzRDy8I/PS +mGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=oT1vYbJHA7eaM3O0BJjvf8OIUVUsjSlbeMghXKKbsyM=; b=oALMZaJwz+SI2gvyokPqB7gaW1BndIoh9uznEsU2kblMNIoishi0QckFLhwVjOnRz9 uPphQJk2TTkhaKlTxs1fzfRl9ZG9sguYEaODKHbKO52nPwlYc25otHovMM3PSChnmuAV gUSe8PksSNwW+dx72y5Pd1ooNEQIobsPEuXdlL6egexmsjkptZPVMm7PXXSTcjrPpeDI ONIYIAsBu26CjLp5JzUqi22L6prCedN0oSrgKZqMRXmQ13AYfJDoBIYyyxC3rGPhfJQL ouBF3gbzqRmwLFISbaDNgUzu8I8fKOITMVM1IQkcW5lUUSlzSruIu+K4svQkZQkxR4GT 3Jjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyj0MMFeAjG+fLvu8EH+elgmzN8IxdDcZKUNEbEZS01MktOg5K VD1UnPMnmtSrEGVvSJIv+maLiw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDgg/7NhS4samC3BiFT+VQYMw1HCa8v+Px6N/xPcPhWUlsAkyiGrooeXoQvhlFoh1gg0aVJw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4643:: with SMTP id o61mr26881481pld.101.1563514950776; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.205.139] ([103.23.203.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4sm56270283pff.108.2019.07.18.22.42.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Borgolte <kevin@iseclab.org>
Message-Id: <267CBE74-9DC5-40D8-A61F-7C566644A1CB@iseclab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_62BF672C-84D7-448F-BD03-FB7010D05E14"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:42:26 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwBKOymQjKsN+GEnygn5ogJb6WUMd=jxRrV2eQWwdiBcg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: add@ietf.org, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, jordanah@princeton.edu, pschmitt@cs.princeton.edu, ahounsel@cs.princeton.edu, feamster@uchicago.edu, dns-privacy@ietf.org
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
References: <402781F4-33D8-4FD4-8087-FDCEFFF2D549@iseclab.org> <CAChr6SwBKOymQjKsN+GEnygn5ogJb6WUMd=jxRrV2eQWwdiBcg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gH950WghE52qR-AmWooOyvj0xU0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Do53 vs DoT vs DoH Page Load Performance Study at ANRW
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:42:48 -0000

> This paper looks interesting. Is the software used in the paper published?

Thanks! The code isn’t open source yet, but we will make it public alongside the Docker setup we used for running it. Not sure when that is going to happen exactly though.

> Or, at least, is the test page set published? I haven't read the whole thing yet, but it seems like the page set would be relevant if the paper tests page load time.

The list of websites is attached. It is extracted from the top 1,000 and 99,000 to 100,000 of a Tranco list.

Best,
Kevin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email