IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 05 November 2014 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21921ACD55 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:50:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sF0mTsGpQlGe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ss.vix.su (ss.vix.su [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A5E1ACD56 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.6.207] (unknown [8.28.216.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ss.vix.su (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26F0AEBC97; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 20:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@redbarn.org)
Message-ID: <545A8DA2.3090508@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:50:42 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
References: <20141101205101.66019.qmail@ary.lan> <54556D3B.4020505@redbarn.org> <CAJE_bqe5iRtRCj3eVC13LBk3PLPFQuO0zkfmYvS+MHdHwYQ+Kg@mail.gmail.com> <20141105185026.GZ30379@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20141105185026.GZ30379@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060103010204040309030105"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gktcoMo6doUUKCuqboIYLfNnAWU
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:50:48 -0000


> Andrew Sullivan <mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
> Wednesday, November 05, 2014 10:50 AM
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:59AM -0800, 神明達哉 wrote:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06
> ...
> ... I believed I had watered down the draft so thoroughly that it
> would be impossible for anyone to disagree with it. I was evidently
> wrong. If we're going to bring that thing back up (in any sense you
> like), then I think it needs to get a spine. Perhaps also my
> willingness to try to find consensus has declined in the intervening
> years: I just don't think there _is_ a consensus on this.
the lack of consensus means it can't be a proposed standard, not that it
can't be an FYI, BCP or similar, right?

the fact of the network is, without a PTR you will have a hard time
originating TCP/25. we should say that.

another fact is, not everyone who should be able to (non-maliciously)
access your web service will have a PTR. we should say that, too.

those aren't opinions and they shouldn't be controversial.

-- 
Paul Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email