[DNSOP] Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on charter-ietf-dnsop-04-01: (with COMMENT)
Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 26 June 2025 16:42 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.132] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894E339DF83E; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <175095614238.874132.4175691953574205440@dt-datatracker-6754d69b7c-p2xd7>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:42:22 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: X5SDIMFKC5UVU57XTLKVPAE6MGVPYRIT
X-Message-ID-Hash: X5SDIMFKC5UVU57XTLKVPAE6MGVPYRIT
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Subject: [DNSOP] Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on charter-ietf-dnsop-04-01: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h1lmG0YzJdEUOj7_5hHA5ze-iFY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-dnsop-04-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dnsop/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am clearing my BLOCK but I agree with Paul that some angst around lack of visibility about the split. Therefore, a mention of the split after DELEG is done is worth mentioning. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool) so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. Paragraph 0 > WG also provides guidance and elaborates best current practices for DNS dep > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A determiner may be missing.
- [DNSOP] Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on cha… Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker