[DNSOP] dnssd session, Monday
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Sat, 02 April 2016 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C5212D138 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecs.soton.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5htRtasQ7HgX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308CF12D10A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u32DKBEc022769 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:20:11 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk u32DKBEc022769
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1459603211; bh=i2si5I85+jvMZD+W2k7t9rTzL20=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:Mime-Version:References; b=x2wp7NUDUjj8w5FXwtvlnPvGaLJiShtlef2tpO7UWJWqJlWhBx3gS1JFS8ypbBGj6 JwmrijuBpSNftyA/ve/ct211/OxiiuRgyhi9l5Yzv0mrS6n2xQlTPaKFrDIgB6dWsF P3RD4VZTo9rEpXU4D8VSp5dSyyz/6sEjnRykF290=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id s31EKB1913606673x1 ret-id none; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:20:11 +0100
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (tchowndsl.claranet.co.uk [212.188.254.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u32DK0Tf006645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:20:01 +0100
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD2C991F-2D2F-4A68-BB15-FCEC943C52BB"
Message-ID: <EMEW3|8d2b71be611963538f2955a5e0ce930bs31EKB03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AB67915F-3914-4276-802C-8759ABF91FF5@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:20:00 +0100
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=s31EKB191360667300; tid=s31EKB1913606673x1; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
References: <AB67915F-3914-4276-802C-8759ABF91FF5@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: u32DKBEc022769
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hfMfuC-uIWiLevfsijjuvRfooqw>
Subject: [DNSOP] dnssd session, Monday
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:20:17 -0000
Hi, Ralph and I would like to draw your attention to the dnssd WG agenda on Monday (see below), and specifically to: a) discussion of the WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02, detailing issues in interop of labels between DNS and other resolution systems, and b) discussion of whether draft-ietf-dnssd-push-06, detailing use of TLS over TCP for subscriber-based notifications, is ready to progress to WGLC Participation is welcome, in person or by jabber. Note we’re still accepting comments for draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02, including those simply saying ‘it’s ready, ship it’. Thanks, Tim and Ralph — snip — DNSSD WG Agenda IETF95, Buenos Aires Monday 4th April 2016 3.50pm - 5.20pm local time Chairs’ Introduction Chairs, 5 mins Discussion: WGLC of Hybrid Unicast/Multicast DNS-Based Service Discovery Stuart Cheshire, 25 mins draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-03 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-03 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-03> The level of feedback, either as comments or ’it’s ready’, has been light. Consideration of the scalability of the solution to a famous level would be welcome. We need positive consensus to move forward. Discussion: Next Steps for DNS Push Notifications Tom Pusateri, 15 min draft-ietf-dnssd-push-06 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-push-06 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-push-06> Discussion: WGLC of On Interoperation of Labels between DNS and Other Resolution Systems Andrew Sullivan, 10 mins draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02> Again, the level of feedback, either as comments or ’it’s ready’, has been light. We need positive consensus to move forward here as well. Discussion: -03 version of Scalable DNS-SD (SSD) Threats Hosnieh Rafiee, 10 mins draft-otis-dnssd-scalable-dns-sd-threats-03 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dnssd-scalable-dns-sd-threats-03 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dnssd-scalable-dns-sd-threats-03> There are very few changes in the latest version. Is it done? Discussion: New draft: Privacy Extensions for DNS-SD Christian Huitema, 10 mins draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-00 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-dnssd-privacy-00> Discussion on next steps for handling dnssd security/privacy issues Which issues matter? Are they operational or are any protocol-specific issues? Should we merge the two drafts? All, 10 mins Close, Next steps Chairs, 5 mins Tim
- [DNSOP] dnssd session, Monday Tim Chown