IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Perl related question on BULK RR

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C38128BBB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ws0ofgwAm-4j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E858129438 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14375 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2017 18:24:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2017 18:24:57 -0000
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:24:35 -0000
Message-ID: <20170328182435.2436.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: dot@dotat.at
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1703281107300.13590@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/icmSAbIPLQ3sH5djMT1nYiLIhRE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Perl related question on BULK RR
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:25:01 -0000

In article <alpine.DEB.2.11.1703281107300.13590@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> you write:
>NAPTR very cunningly avoids this trap (IIRC) by constraining the rewrites
>to be on a strictly monotonically reducing suffix of the input.

Also, NAPTR does all of the complex stuff in the client applications.
All the DNS does is to return records.

>So my question is, how does the BULK rewriting system interact with DNS
>loops? Is there a CPU-eating tarpit in there?

Probably.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email