IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] remarks on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-01

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AA41A8974 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 04:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKW-GT4VtITL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 04:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 810641A897A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 04:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [67.211.120.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854CB8A035 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:05:12 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150319110507.GI6046@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20150318013805.GH4385@mx1.yitter.info> <55093E8C.3030300@redbarn.org> <550A8F58.2040009@nlnetlabs.nl> <20150319105640.GH6046@mx1.yitter.info> <550AABE7.3050100@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <550AABE7.3050100@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jygsGT3Y-esmVH5S75GUI-oc2KE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] remarks on draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:05:16 -0000

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 03:58:47AM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:
> 
> if you want new behaviour, negotiate for it.

So you want a way to signal the new behaviour and negotiate that?

It strikes me that the EDNS0 option that Paul Wouters wrote up was
intended to offer such signalling, and people thought it was not
necessary.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email