[DNSOP] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-10.txt
Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Wed, 23 July 2025 12:21 UTC
Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF424952756 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 05:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74AM0nDqxR4m for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 05:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72348495274F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 05:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45617887276so43843675e9.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 05:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1753273261; x=1753878061; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lLu/ai/nv4YVQMJqOJaWmcQNJcnzD1HhNx8t4ZYnteY=; b=WW0hRYiTqVPUjsrzbYPwqlbpCm+ZMfBH05Ze/Co9J+fkdgR29VJ2bkPCDl0IPIczaw rBOG61ZPVu7swbgyAl+WCth9ScXhkCodqEKByw/u9DQEfDpQg8fsQ86Cugdy3rrWE7ss OZBPkaaWObTMxEooGZWoYPnMafsCqxduiRRB65Q/AWORPUFvNNlHA+D6iONtjdxKTxgt stuHR9tN+g79tUsdAhbbd1EFXh7DEiPpnMkfb7MFUTuK8CGErl/eIcskFAutJxpqun0d VHhpkCPPKSindx32ntM9UbpgldJfgJ9YLmUZ9CDMYFCSYM1b0Olz9TcVn+AiVA86fByJ 9t+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753273261; x=1753878061; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lLu/ai/nv4YVQMJqOJaWmcQNJcnzD1HhNx8t4ZYnteY=; b=s/5/AwC1R/8cwDEZjXRpk+/TDaVDMs199hRmTe4XKkbNe/p8CSmcqJf6rIqzSoE9a9 kFmM1ooOFEXTnLy+x3kSCaVQ4UR4uKJrYxpMi+5ndkIvHcWYJbb1pUyjaDNVw4/pza9R 9oXbHA1ldWu/GzOMXDvuJXd8KXvo8YCM1O722N0q4oTHlMMi+5ptlialZdw3Seu9EYsG krxFrL8X678rHGi8uvo0BZuJ2m7xj5B6JxqK55yXNzNFxwNWimkWBZ+x80+zeZ+bBjMi m3JKv1elKB3XpsFVePHVRyIcIs6129NpmVYIKDsLXMz6TxfPwtPEk9WZK0kXDqU7oTiA /eLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywan63jQLlTmUwT4qIAcGLJijoP+uc4mZk9gu8YrZsd99zCfy5O EZZAXCwZX98RDj9fial7XxGVxQqSmSNieHE4CjtCkbodMfK/li5gCDd5O13H3HMDpAjLEIJHeCy 0TmorOPnTWZA+yQs4p/CsUEQ7XnNRfLk=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctf7h4CvNabscgcliwFGqmzLJM7PQrkHskJ2BZKR789NGwOWR+HT6fsdYP7Bvb S7Ud1Erq6jI5gdO1R3hf2wURbZOhv8Ji8rtRx5kPZ3WKPu6AlALZK0b3f0fAFU1b6crpRiCHJVg +OQovJ+Mf3b5z27GQDfn6/SuMUj1NJChqwq0av40HxKSt0VfoZRlPiU66Gihh20nuGF1qrUlZtR vZChHCT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHKG1ERTNC0Id+k5M61l9lMB/54yqn0IIIUrq4vdqQVC0lsN0JPsu8Kra9TufCufmFRLh7mkuBDoWgGMnAzhbM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c25:b0:456:1e5a:885e with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45868c79025mr26531555e9.3.1753273260672; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 05:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <175084304994.726740.675962462505238204@dt-datatracker-6754d69b7c-p2xd7> <0558e2eb-181a-4163-8454-737783eb090a@nlnetlabs.nl> <1cd28ee3-8a3b-412a-9c09-9cbec03e50b6@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1cd28ee3-8a3b-412a-9c09-9cbec03e50b6@isc.org>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:20:49 +0200
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyrcEC2QyYQwXjF5bvZfYUqTsM8tTdVz6rf5R70JevDTD_Ua8cLZLaTAo4
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdW-7W-QGOAUdOTC7w94JL=2vqmNybJ4QiSeOWTHgynOkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5a52a063a97bd13"
Message-ID-Hash: LY42IESRVI3G3QUADGYWQ2DXL4CJIHNB
X-Message-ID-Hash: LY42IESRVI3G3QUADGYWQ2DXL4CJIHNB
X-MailFrom: shuque@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-10.txt
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kALGZL4sweHGmr1XjKz8h5uxtL0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:21 PM Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> wrote: > On 25. 06. 25 11:39, Willem Toorop wrote: > > Dear dnsop, > > > > We have a new version of the Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers > > draft addressing the feedback received during the previous last call. > > > > * We changed the abstract to reflect that the algorithms described in > > the document are optional and that the document describes the > > benefits and considerations of using this approach. > > I like the new Abstract and new Introduction. Also thank for the new > section 4. Limiting upgrading NS Credibility, this is important to > document. > Thanks! > I think beginning of section 2. Motivation was forgotten. Right now it > says: > > > This document > > aims to bring more commonality and predictability by standardizing > > the behavior in a way that comports with the DNS protocol. > > This somewhat contradicts the new Abstract and Intro which say this is > all optional. Noted. Yes, we'll update this section to bring it in line. > Also Intended status: Standards Track is confusing. > Why is it confusing? Standards Track does not mean mandatory to implement. (I've encouraged other folks to write up another standards track draft to describe alternative ways to do referral processing.) Shumon.
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-i… Willem Toorop
- [DNSOP] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Petr Špaček
- [DNSOP] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Shumon Huque