[DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-18: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 26 March 2020 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460853A094F; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.123.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158524165726.5443.18120446987099045377@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kVEB40Y9YHmofLxBfLr5gyjpmt4>
Subject: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:54:19 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the draft. It's always good for congestion controls if congestion-based packet losses are disambiguated from other types. A few nits: - Section 1 has a number of acronyms without clear references (DANE, SPF, TLSA). Please define them on first use. - Sec. 3.1.5. Please add a comma after "attempts" - Sec 3.2.4 uses lower case versions of the normative keywords. Selecting a synonym would improve it.
- [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Martin Duke via Datatracker