Re: [DNSOP] Any news for QNAME minimisation

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 04 February 2016 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CD51B3149 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:20:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id st__yiDRcq31 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5A11B3147 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FB04280605; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:20:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8972805B6; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:20:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F38AB38003; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:19:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:19:51 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org, Joel Jaggli - AD <joelja@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160204151951.GA12294@nic.fr>
References: <20160119170514.GA10764@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160119170514.GA10764@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/lG--V8Kk3C3q7knDWk60Ksb3HeE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Any news for QNAME minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:20:25 -0000

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:05:14PM +0100,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 15 lines which said:

> The datatracker shows a positive decision by IESG.
> 
> <http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html> says "Expected
> next step 	Writeup is needed" (there is a writeup
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation/shepherdwriteup/>)
> 
> It is not clear to me what can/should I do now.

Any info, someone?

I notice that cookies are in the same state ("Approved-announcement to
be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed"). Does anyone know who should
do something and what?