Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-04.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Mon, 29 August 2016 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779C012D0BD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usrwNcFUaeRH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BE312B005 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u134so88839901ywg.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DjUvpM28hnRKPg5UbxpgLeGoSp/Ilof3vR0awC3j4Qg=; b=KDWQemz2HAuUgk1lMZeRYuMBj8TB1quf5N6hU9CUrAyIeeo6UfaaiDEnhv4eTH5Yj/ MGf+6QmaZNt3YIIKPOXYXfSwwlzALEFXC+fpcMKuuBC8jvovWSHW0PY9NaixwGtgHE7p sT+nXyKZG9Z1d++7NllJ5AAOUJ+PGtPKo2GTDRi44XSwqckTykfs/CCRyCUcq9qrGZ6D 5gI3OYW6hpSTOfz8XN63VhKxK0xVsnpOaMtNyYG3YEUyZtjguf0gTSF4C6aPb/QE/aNa I+NE+3gOdF3fSagTUtF9F5KrBVDYon2/K/TdwJ4R/4/IXfjTjWzmWOqNmTlL2LustOrh XQXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DjUvpM28hnRKPg5UbxpgLeGoSp/Ilof3vR0awC3j4Qg=; b=PY7RzNisdF+BaKnSJNrgC3s5VA267fCZW4zQMmBUrvdIMPO04BK8G6AwMnrtymyj1E oQ9lFUpFCatZuqOcYnkh3HlSDYYiJebLo4n3HBl1JUUk1vdUrpC2sY4zWYNDgcBdEM4M cViX3uHa/zsVD8GGC73Id2B6ZBTHkvoAsSUdwAhlyZUapv7mHDvx8Z85vKfkcgn26m1H ytfl/QCZIGX4Fwt2sDJPyCIXz3vcaKUbP/8X8kJzy/Nx052HaH390R8atZz9Y26lDi1X pRngiqr4pwzQXksEinYjlDVhwxYlZyIZ6C4rw4NRHQHFy3CvCwp1UqYFM7Mb0rGNfCxx usDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPSVJmRQHrhIO7k9vOHWeDfXeZs7gTl1UbrVqN9a8Zmjg60fRBnkB0xEKb5UNrnbS1v2x+Wa94fG5ryWKGi
X-Received: by 10.13.217.20 with SMTP id b20mr16404320ywe.44.1472487186083; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.255.3 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <147226433816.28458.15315775097911417820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147226433816.28458.15315775097911417820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:13:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8CUi8xHirC=ZCm7V=up_DimU8aLzwRiMJb+pAscR9yt-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fbe74a9ff6c053b382353"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nesjseLCKjcRJW3F6dYplXsESDY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:13:09 -0000

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:18 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers -
> Failure To Respond.
>         Author          : M. Andrews
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-04.txt
>         Pages           : 19
>         Date            : 2016-08-26
>
> Abstract:
>    The DNS is a query / response protocol.  Failure to respond or to
>    respond correctly to queries causes both immediate operational
>    problems and long term problems with protocol development.
>
>    This document identifies a number of common kinds of queries to which
>    some servers either fail to respond or else respond incorrectly.
>    This document also suggests procedures for TLD and other similar zone
>    operators to apply to help reduce / eliminate the problem.
>
>    The document does not look at the DNS data itself, just the structure
>    of the responses.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-04
>
>
One nit:

 2.1.3.  Unknown DNS opcodes

"no requirement than anything"
should be
"no requirement that anything"

-- 
Bob Harold