Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03

Dave Lawrence <> Mon, 25 March 2019 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC08120045 for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCX17M7AkrAn for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFD4120033 for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 102) id 033528EB53; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:17 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:16 -0400
From: Dave Lawrence <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:45:23 -0000

Paul Vixie writes:
> i would withdraw that objection if this draft incorporates section 2 of 
>, to wit:

I always liked resimprove.  Warren and I were talking about it, and if
you would like we'd be quite happy to pick it up and get it moving in

This document already has text, however, for refreshing the delegation
and I don't believe it really needs to much detail as to what that
means.  "Delegation Revalidation Upon NS RRset Expiry" is an issue
orthogonal to serve-stale, and in fact most often applies when
serve-stale isn't even being triggered; it's a regular occurrence
under normal operations.  Ballooning the standards action section here
to nearly three times its existing size is unnecessary bloat.

Please let us know if you'd like us to take up the charge for