IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-00.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 15 August 2022 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5C5C1524CF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xbwJba5fx61 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31180C14F74C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4M61Jc0WwXzCy1; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1660584048; bh=dQckXeMlLo1hBb85FqMTvg9S7iVEWRS7EeDfcM0ibY8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=oT0bBenbWGUMOt31LFoufPMMXlz7Hp7xvP1EEbLgj9teA5FCGdnDlCxED2XCkq8po QXw4gtvFKlI766Ne1Uq52apeyAgEdCF7p3pg37158PqcajrR+qW/PIT8TxnYgcq2of zdGYTDPcjFwyXwyAoZq4srYI89u8FyZjbk+1AdVo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZuAJ7ZpE_TNi; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:20:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:20:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AFFB43B74CE; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDF93B74CD; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:20:45 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <yblo7wliip7.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
Message-ID: <58d376d7-75c1-de1-d491-e01e2083e15c@nohats.ca>
References: <yblo7wliip7.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oFNyxYZ5QPQy4VrLTptOeRIwmQo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:20:54 -0000

first read of rfcdiff

 	guidance for DNSSEC. This document obsoletes <xref target="RFC6944"/>.

- no targets allowed in the abstract :)

- You removed RFC8174 from the 2119 text for no good reason :)

- SHA1 changed for validation  from MUST to SHOULD NOT. This is the
   discussion item for the WG :)

- GOST to MUST NOT, ok but could add GOST 2012 as per draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis

- You changed NOT RECOMMENDED terminology to SHOULD NOT (I think I
   originally had that and Ondrey / the WG preferred NOT RECOMMENDED).
   Either works for me.

- Some updated text, clarifications and common practises. all good
   changes.

- NIT: The SHA-256 is RECOMMENDED [for the] DS and CDS algorithm[s].

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email