Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl> Fri, 19 March 2021 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD763A0D97 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCUIaEzAEmyM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.65.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72383A0D96 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 03:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A60600C1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1616150862; bh=JKQbOY+m3ybew6b8UUPubxzCwzFf/dlXGVDotrvldW4=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ApiM7U3X8Daq5w3QxiChouAmftbM1fhgiIOa0bNVHmdDFWoEjcui/iHsxebbZpMZh BbdxvLtiu4/Irx1rZIcxEq5pjkn4MEQe4d8JZn7DqAEWr3yqY+U3Hv48WqLt2Jj+La ma59YtyzlbivO6zJoaj48jrkKnrMQsJQOTwa+ZXBfekkf0A3SDnpuG4LUD0CTX0qIW 3qk4z7gSjuF3AzQKRPbNPaUhuZJ3lA/ZP8gRsU1UH418YipjlhbscnpWj/NbEsLHnJ PHI741J6EyzIoozCHAl8bi3U6pWGB36y6kuGFJzlT6TITUMyzM1SfxrXCw7vMppIyh 0OWYHKU2gFedg==
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <161600103837.12472.4123883592260330100@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHbrMsA3NzpY9RFNhWsvYgQ0hqcqEDuMUrw7HmGBJZ1+uaLtNA@mail.gmail.com> <600ED9AF-2C6F-429F-AF39-445E29E686EF@apple.com> <4DFDEFA6-4132-42CA-8DA7-D0537C5FC29A@isc.org> <99cdd98b-ac59-c96c-a73f-a58729c2ca52@nic.cz> <fbeb99ad-9ccc-1050-a0d2-3b6e5287ed7a@nlnetlabs.nl> <214c21bc-2d05-0c58-ba0f-4891bae0e343@powerdns.com>
From: Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>
Message-ID: <b6b65c08-55c1-9f2c-a33b-29ab8e806d45@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:47:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <214c21bc-2d05-0c58-ba0f-4891bae0e343@powerdns.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/okidoZWYPZc66vadCxwqXTkEA-c>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:47:49 -0000

Op 19-03-2021 om 11:19 schreef Pieter Lexis:
> Hi Willem, Ben,
> 
> On 3/19/21 11:14 AM, Willem Toorop wrote:
>> Also, it would have been nice to have some test-vectors of RR's in
>> presentation format and wire format (in hexdump) in an appendix in the
>> document, to assist in the creation of interoperable implementations.
>> Maybe this can still be added?
> 
> +1000
> 
> The PowerDNS unit tests already has a bunch of tests that do the
> presentation -> wire -> presentation roundtrip. I could convert those to
> using example.com, use some more hex and send a PR to the authors should
> they want this.

:+1:

That'd be nice!

Do you also have tests for peculiar/corner and failure cases?

Cheers,
-- Willem

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Pieter
>