Re: [DNSOP] TCP/UDP performances
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 24 November 2009 20:17 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3533A67F7 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:17:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyPSNYnQhX58 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:17:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A91E3A67C2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD15CE6065; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAOKH60B049191; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:17:07 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200911242017.nAOKH60B049191@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <51eafbcb0911240543m38c27080xc9c54cc1c3f6036c@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:43:51 BST." <51eafbcb0911240543m38c27080xc9c54cc1c3f6036c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:17:06 +1100
Sender: marka@isc.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] TCP/UDP performances
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:17:19 -0000
In message <51eafbcb0911240543m38c27080xc9c54cc1c3f6036c@mail.gmail.com>, Daniel Mi gault writes: > Hi, > We are looking for measurements on the following points : > - How TCP affects DNS servers performances compared to UDP? > - Proportion of clients that switch to TCP? By machine or by vendor? Every Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, HPUX, MacOS, Windows box switches to TCP by default. General purpose computers usually support it. The nameservers shipped with these boxes also support TCP. The places which don't are some middle boxes which ends up breaking the connection between the general purpose computers and the recursive resolvers particularly in the home market. > - What kind of client are they? Are they those that do not implement > EDNS0? Most of these general purpose computers also support EDNS though it is not enabled by default. > Feel free to provide any paper links you know. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Migault > Orange Labs -- Security > +33 6 70 72 69 58 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [DNSOP] TCP/UDP performances Daniel Migault
- Re: [DNSOP] TCP/UDP performances Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] TCP/UDP performances Sebastian Castro