IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stepping back on the DNS discovery discussion

itojun@iijlab.net Tue, 15 July 2003 16:00 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA25302 for <dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:00:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.10.Beta0/8.12.10.Beta0) with ESMTP id h6FFf4mb017241 for <dnsop-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:41:04 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.10.Beta0/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id h6FFf4XJ017240 for dnsop-outgoing; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:41:04 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-dnsop@cafax.se using -f
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [219.101.47.130]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.10.Beta0/8.12.10.Beta0) with ESMTP id h6FFf2mb017235 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:41:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E6013; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:41:00 +0900 (JST)
To: soohong.park@samsung.com
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
In-reply-to: soohong.park's message of Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:15:02 +0900. <0HI20079QNP0TG@ms3.samsung.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: Stepping back on the DNS discovery discussion
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:41:00 +0900
Message-Id: <20030715154100.33E6013@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk

>>They were designed as such. This approach has lost traction.
>We have to go to the right direction 
>"IPv6 DNS Discovery based on RA or ND"

	who decided that this is the right direction?  it is yet to be decided.
	the above statement is not acceptable.

	to be clear, in the ietf there are multiple efforts on "service
	discovery" mechansisms, including DHCP, piggyback on RA, srvloc,
	DNS SRV record and a lot more.  basically we are in confusion state.
	draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-discovery-analysis-00.txt tried to clear up the
	confusion, but it was not enough.

itojun
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email