Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 05 July 2018 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A33312D7F8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aT5dgzCQd8Ug for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008B5130DE9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.179] (unknown [5.33.10.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E8B9892B9; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 20:40:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B3E8242.1010709@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 13:40:34 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CAJhMdTO2kj+nUqESg3ew=wwZuB9OzkJE6pST=mae7pHiEk4-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <20180619190213.B76962846E19@ary.qy> <20180622182752.GA83312@isc.org> <af9b422a-90a0-b204-70d6-12566d7b65dc@bellis.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806251459510.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1806251104490.18905@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806251637060.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1806251240410.32227@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806251756120.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <5B311FB1.3040304@redbarn.org> <CADyWQ+G-RabH8JyOOEhmf6nf5vT3bWb__xW_DSYyTYx-iKNKiw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+G-RabH8JyOOEhmf6nf5vT3bWb__xW_DSYyTYx-iKNKiw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pOLEPLWOO9DDJypC87ntsjsF0Og>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 20:40:49 -0000


Tim Wicinski wrote:
> ...
> What we do know is:
>
>   - We're not going to do SRV records (sorry Mark).
>   - We're not going to ask the IAB to give a waiver on DNSSEC.
>   - We still bang into each other over this.

i think you will find that there is no dnssec-compatible way to solve 
this problem without upgrades to both authority AND recursive AND stub 
dns agents, AND to the getnameinfo-or-similar API. if i'm right, it'll 
be necessary to make hard choices, such has, reconsider the constraints.

-- 
P Vixie