Re: [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Fri, 21 March 2014 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61371A0969 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zcXcqQv9_L6Z for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EBA1A072C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y1so1565548lam.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=G8O/CQY3pWsWC4HaVTUN2LlfjnkXXI/MKeofXTYcJiY=; b=n5V0EPDItAd0ivUzN7eewvH2C8SUutAU/t+DXgJd81RQll+U1zq+oqPvocJF4fI4Mw +uuowU2UgEGCFAHe3TMRyjPGhaDBUsg7PRzRCx9TnXQMoDXzSNTDmxXv+jE/T9Rhm4Nx 5bMlJEq++z4sBRdfo4OM6OzXRV9y9U9t7fexS6PmTdEGh3H28DoqcVaU9KgjN3j9QmMf SNnhBVDQ6tZkPpRml2pHPwlbE/APPGeBQ2TRROzC8DciMstGDsSlbT5VLBioAS1ohNGF HbNHavNpQwQ7s5uoHWngt/dgNjaAj3NS0DSuQQnlldiCtZ8Ysrvty/zMJyoPNhwCaQUa 4QCQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.209.5 with SMTP id mi5mr24314898lbc.30.1395403905668; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <532BB27F.9020208@bogus.com>
References: <532BB27F.9020208@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:11:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwhpvc51WBgjs_TvgdmVG7hDBPKAt57zTtP3g2uFU2nnFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/q8MvEWol6PTYWiSR7Et7SAgK1Rg
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:12:02 -0000
This was the use case that originally drove the development of OmniBroker. If we do DNS Encryption right it is going to be very easy for end users to chose their DNS provider and very hard for the authorities to block them. Security is a balance. Going through 8.8.8.8 rather than direct means that you are leaking privacy sensitive information to Google. But that is probably less important here than the censorship attack. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: > https://twitter.com/enginonder/status/446819815106576384/photo/1 > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] on the subject of dnse Phillip Hallam-Baker