Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Thu, 08 September 2022 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08ABC1522B4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RYaxoJt3vYyb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa3.lax.icann.org (ppa3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A464EC14F73F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa3.lax.icann.org (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 288G4qmt020386 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:04:52 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.29; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:04:51 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0986.029; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:04:51 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)
Thread-Index: AQHYuMJTTKMGJ4SZhEuw4WRofe80J63CgwuAgAFBfoCAA73TAIABq9kAgABP4gCAAKQwgIAAP44AgAqhVACAABUmAIAAHOsAgAAH7oCAAB+jgIAADVuAgADC5oCAAAf1AIAACEeA
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:04:51 +0000
Message-ID: <11DAF42E-DFDA-49EA-A021-91A6979992E6@icann.org>
References: <CAHw9_iJg7yTECPbPvSNxac21My4SqPjMjhYS4tFRWBzFmjkLjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCipoo2u2h8XtJp8iwrg-bonMC785RehC3bVzbMKaLv+Kpg@mail.gmail.com> <0203FD85-487D-4B64-88BF-818B5BE0BC70@apple.com> <CAHbrMsCZSkakKvnxTsqQ0JmywNAHwVC1DyN0aVJ72sH7fgy6pA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLNSnwUyZomkQ49Czhk-evy1Z4LjL7CfVhP7EFvZpBh5A@mail.gmail.com> <Yxk1Iikv8XazQa7o@straasha.imrryr.org> <Yxk7ycs0274UMSSh@straasha.imrryr.org> <0A4F52A8-378F-4222-9E5A-041A82E97C79@icann.org> <CAH1iCiriUcqprYj+LJGoo40o-dRsYyGmOFU_6VWbTXBt8+xnJw@mail.gmail.com> <A222DD8A-517D-4D7C-AB8E-2EEB99FF1C7E@icann.org> <YxoLstfurrWgGZUs@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <YxoLstfurrWgGZUs@straasha.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C878BEBB-97C8-4C56-B80E-5A090BE10D85"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.528,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-08_10,2022-09-08_01,2022-06-22_01
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qgxQBaSZ3tfk7_X5IyfNcnmP_PQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:04:58 -0000

On Sep 8, 2022, at 8:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> This is a bug fix, the proposed behaviour makes no sense when $QNAME
> is the unaltered (attrleaf prefixed) starting point.  The current
> meaning was not intended.  If the edit can be made without any
> major process, just a note to the RFC editor, it'll save errata,
> and possible confusion later.

A technical change made after the IESG review requires, at a minimum, another IESG review. The IESG could ask for another IETF review, if they want. It's up to Warren, the responsible AD, to decide if that's "major process". 

--Paul Hoffman