IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Nudging some reviews

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 04 February 2015 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BF71A87CC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:21:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbtDx4I2ILWW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:21:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A901A046D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:21:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3442802FF; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:21:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A387280102; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:21:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BEB4C0053; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:20:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:20:35 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150204152035.GA10843@nic.fr>
References: <058025BC-A42A-4A47-B6D3-82CACEC9A0B4@vpnc.org> <1584F2B8-952D-4301-82CB-59FE449CFE30@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1584F2B8-952D-4301-82CB-59FE449CFE30@gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.0
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae i686
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ql2mBJiLOb2bRlleDlfcAGL68F8>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Nudging some reviews
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:21:09 -0000

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:51:41PM -0500,
 Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 52 lines which said:

> We had some very lively discussion in Honolulu, and several
> documents formally adopted by the WG since. In order to make them as
> useful as possible, and in order to advance them through the process
> and actually get RFCs published, we gotta provide reviews, text,
> discussion….

There is a big discrepancy between the number of reviewers, as
registered on <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html>,
and the actual reviews :-(

In Dallas, I will suggest that we stop adopting documents as WG items:
we clearly adopted too many, already.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email