Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-03.txt

Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org> Tue, 23 October 2018 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8F0130DCA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vy6xnvys8ad8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E023D130DC7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10383AB042; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3AA160042; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80193160076; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bER4Wh71Ptkd; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.0.181] (40.20.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.20.40]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0888160042; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:05 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.100.43\))
From: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri6f+9OUKa_cJN4zWkgOepwbuJo4WbBi8FGJscP=X8rmZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:04:02 +0200
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3053A181-EA90-428C-82BB-0768EE45C497@isc.org>
References: <154031719651.31281.7278063213758534340@ietfa.amsl.com> <2AF9FBC4-8552-4B47-BC33-8D78FE92A734@isc.org> <CADyWQ+EGXFLM_8UX1mDv9mY1Jtiz=amutidxtM5t-cSYY4HgKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri6f+9OUKa_cJN4zWkgOepwbuJo4WbBi8FGJscP=X8rmZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/quj_nRveeJxdYgeQ-_bK0kLKhQY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:04:09 -0000

Dick, good catch!

Tim, do you want me to publish -04 addressing this or would it be better to fix this in RFC Editor queue.

The diff is simple:

https://github.com/oerdnj/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/commit/7164f8a6ee4b210f5d83684156cb2905769f7fb4#diff-e9d2d55442440292530838192590a871

O.
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org

> On 23 Oct 2018, at 22:37, Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The WGLC has completed and we were waiting on the authors on addressing all comments and updating their document. 
> The chairs feel this is ready to proceed. 
> 
> Just spotted a fumble with document references in section 3.1 which will need to be fixed before this is put to bed.
> 
> [3.1, para 6] reads:
>    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.11-94) has been superseded by GOST R 34.11-2012
>    in [
> RFC6986
> ].  The GOST R 34.11-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
>    in DNSSEC.
> 
> should read: 
>    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.10-2001) has been superseded by GOST R 34.10-2012
>    in [
> RFC7091
> ].  The GOST R 34.10-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
>    in DNSSEC.
> 
> 
> I apologise for not having noticed this earlier.
> 
> 
> -- Dick
> 
> 
> 
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop