[DNSOP] informal review request: server diagnostics option
Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Wed, 31 July 2013 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F2B21F9CB1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mdlXiftaZzMp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9D621F97E6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE518C9425 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from each@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1375286282; bh=N6y7NbjeCdQfsqE6brA3ymUQdOlmkIm8PZUOwECDpCk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=DL54mDX/6zNDl7dIpM5Ea6MWHkyOp60mCOr7l2jAwDJFGN6DX/i9n575ciaUn4FRQ Z7IivqvD9I3JdNLt0yVTgJWE8lEf+3909h5oyiwS/VH09XfEjMbU+7ZE/RDSuSf3NU /WJJdT6oufSTHk3qI0SrOCncnhgkGn19CFZaVdPA=
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from each@isc.org)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id DD346216C25; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:57:50 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130731155750.GA18546@isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
Subject: [DNSOP] informal review request: server diagnostics option
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:58:03 -0000
Greetings, I've been working for a while on a draft describing a DNS protocol extention that would allow a server (e.g. a validating resolver) to return, upon request, additional diagnostic information along with SERVFAIL responses, providing more transparency into the reasons for failures. The work has been on hold for a while, waiting until I was free to attend another IETF, but at the urging of Francis Dupont, I've gone ahead and submitted it today. This is an individual contribution: as a protocol extension, I believe it falls outside dnsop's charter. However, it may be of interest to members of this working group, and certainly could use your input; I'd appreciate any suggestions and corrections people may wish to offer. Thanks, -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.