Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2913129411 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FiBcV3BVTJS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB05127078 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c10so129315852qtd.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=N+QfH0lURpQc7OIk1u+AraG6AtzhNlWcdQbpjCC/ghY=; b=Yr+wibPKNGUmcyjltHN9T36hVT/UZg5ADlH4albBkUpCVHQksRg/oZEUbWlAQvtwGG gSDAWEiij6+VgWJ5e2KnAaDKhL6PJ/0YYQ24EV9g745N/K1fbKHLvb2pBNJVfED830r8 Qi6CL2I6XfUqBVcC9DP0QerpJ5g/yGKQ3hXWT5L0A16qQq829f9XEyIUoEx1CJ0ttrfo urV7yOvdPeR36IjBzEIijt6Kdf7v0ETN5InEccazzKZU+aXO+hwPWl0U2yw0HPe6zGkJ 7o76fbUfBeDFMwu/bzABeljwWhLZ8wmVrENqSEXDkf/NGIYleMwFjiRiEy3CL+itntzu EJdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=N+QfH0lURpQc7OIk1u+AraG6AtzhNlWcdQbpjCC/ghY=; b=O/+fhmOKWJTQ+RjL2+3ZOq594sZLIUW1p+HjMe7i7CrRizFXUPLuC1FoeOYxEm4SKL vv51vFuuH2yPn/Z1PtWDi00sPfGeD052NCWux8zOZWNiDjZG2jAYzcCjKRyKkHvxG8ws /6S93StfvFmSLMEWfXeCcDIBUDGLIlsb67TCWhmemZANM3VPQoJ7iRLwAn72nGB90qBw jmXa0LmQCDmPC/bDv1TE96iPBMxiakFPQYkAG8zJ4If2sAvo6nL4bEusAgODDNjXW5nH Ukp6R5pLrH1wJ4e5kZEHvDBaUlO+bDOPUMbYoE30ug8kNqNoubXFRvfk1x2Q2hXRvtz7 st9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBWjwOoEDwL9ZiwGjBbURAVxeseofomQUB7rNu8Z68F2jAy2lwM w79SvLNsKHshiV/k
X-Received: by 10.237.61.231 with SMTP id j36mr68968568qtf.111.1497280381789; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o41sm4935986qtc.26.2017.06.12.08.13.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170612150034.f4etrpuhbnvbzpzz@hanna.meerval.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:12:59 -0400
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FA9EF11-83AF-4B1B-88D4-151108A47057@fugue.com>
References: <149678027581.3850.9197039878287017082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170612135200.ya3tivlhg2dhe3ry@nic.fr> <20170612150034.f4etrpuhbnvbzpzz@hanna.meerval.net>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/s6Jubz9iH_jkllPyAlSS_QsCZi8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:13:05 -0000

On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> NEW:
>   The situation was somewhat forced, both by the fact that use of the
>   .onion domain name by the Tor Project predates the process described
>   in RFC 6761 by 9 years, and because a deadline [CABF-DEADLINE] had
>   been set by the CA/Browser Forum [CABF] after which all PKI
>   certificates for internal names would expire and no new certificates
>   would be issued. At the time .onion was considered an internal name.
>   IETF recognition of the .onion as a Special-Use Top-Level Domain Name
>   facilitated the development of a certificate issuance process
>   specific to .onion domain names [CABF-BALLOT144]. 
> 
> [CABF-DEADLINE] should link to https://www.digicert.com/internal-names.htm
> [CABF] should link to https://cabforum.org/
> [CABF-BALLOT144] should link to https://cabforum.org/2015/02/18/ballot-144-validation-rules-dot-onion-names/

Thanks, I think this is better text.

> I wasn't there, but reading ballot-144, some cabforum mails, and 
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/landmark-hidden-services-onion-names-reserved-ietf
> it appears to me that all parties involved were actively trying to fix a
> long standing broken situation.

Yes, that's what it looked like to me as well.