Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-02.txt

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org> Sat, 03 November 2018 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@mukund.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C6A129BBF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 01:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rfhc_2ecbCpv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 01:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:644b::225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D82912958B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 01:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from naina (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:65e9:6894:696:c2e5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8892C32C091A; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 08:18:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:18:15 +0700
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181103081815.GB32569@naina>
References: <20181103081228.GA32569@naina>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181103081228.GA32569@naina>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sRoMQAmJLXeKabp7oiusugIVnJg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 08:18:23 -0000

On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 03:12:28PM +0700, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> The D flag seems unnecessary. Just the presence of the EDNS option in
> query from the client should serve to indicate to a server that the
> client explicitly does not want stale answers.

I withdraw this comment. It appears that the client can also find out
whether an option is stale by sending the option.

		Mukund