[DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Two comments:

1) It seems to me that this sentence in section 7 should/could actually be
phrased as a normative requirement in this document: "it is not necessary that
every client request needs to
   trigger a new lookup flow in the presence of stale data, but rather
   that a good-faith effort has been recently made to refresh the stale
   data before it is delivered to any client."
Maybe worth considering...

2) I find the Implementation Status section (8) actually quite interesting for
this document and maybe it should be considered to keep it in the document for
final publication.